简介：华中科技大学硕士学位论文国家经营性财产所有权行使论姓名林红平申请学位级别硕士专业民商法学指导教师裴丽萍20090516华中科技大学硕士学位论华中科技大学硕士学位论华中科技大学硕士学位论华中科技大学硕士学位论文文文文IIABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTASTHECOREOFTHEREALRIGHTS,OWNERSHIPISONEOFTHEPRIVATERIGHTS,HASTHECHARACTEROFTRANSACTIONSTATEOWNERSHIPISTHATTHECOUNTRYASTHECIVILSUBJECTISENTITLEDTOPOSSESS,UTILIZE,SEEKPROFITSFROMANDDISPOSEOFTHERIGHTSONITSPROPERTYCOUNTRYHASDUALLEGALPERSONALITYANDINOURCOUNTRYTHEPRODUCTIONMATERIALBELONGSTOTHEWHOLEPEOPLESOINTHEACADEMIC,THESTATEOWNERSHIPSNATURE,SUBJECTANDOBJECTTHATEXISTGREATDISPUTESTHEDIFFERENTOPINIONSALSOEXISTINTHECURRENTLAWSUCHASTHE“CONSTITUTIONLAW“,“PROPERTYLAW“ANDTHE“ENTERPRISESTATEOWNEDASSETSLAW“,ALLHAVETHERULESTHATTHESTATEPROPERTYBELONGSTOTHECOUNTRYANDALSOBELONGSTOTHEWHOLEPEOPLEACCORDINGTOPROPERTYLAW,STATEOWNERSHIPANDTHEGENERALOWNERSHIPAREPROTECTEDEQUALLYINORDERTODEFINETHESTATEOWNERSHIPSNATURE,SUBJECTANDOBJECTCLEARLY,WESHOULDSTARTWITHSTUDYINGTHEGENERALOWNERSHIPTHEPRIVATELAWTELLSUSTHATOWNERSHIPISAPRIVATERIGHT,NOTPOWERUNLESSTHELAWCLEARLYDEFINEDTHATRIGHTCANBETHEOBJECTOFTHEOWNERSHIP,DEITYTHINGISTHEOWNERSHIPSONLYOBJECTOWNERSHIPSSUBJECTMUSTBEAFFIRMATIVESTATEOWNERSHIPALSOHAVETHECHARACTERCOUNTRYCANBEAPRIVATECORPORATEAND“THEWHOLEPEOPLE“CANTBEAFFIRMATIVEDECIDETHATCOUNTRYISTHESTATEOWNERSHIPSREALSUBJECTPEOPLEARETHEMASTERSOFTHECOUNTRYTHEWHOLEPEOPLEENJOY“ECONOMICPOWER“ONTHEINTERESTBYSTATEOWNERSHIPTHEREALIZATIONOFSTATEOWNERSHIPMUSTDEPENDONTHEEXERTIONTHEEXERTIONOFTHESTATEOPERATINGOWNERSHIPISTHEBODYOFTHEEXERTIONCHOOSINGTHEWAYSOFRIGHTSEXERTIONISTHERESULTOFTHEGAMEBETWEENEFFICIENCYANDFAIRNESS,THEEXERTIONOFSTATEOPERATIONOWNERSHIPALSOFOLLOWTHISRULETHESTATEOWNEDENTERPRISEMANAGEMENTMODESMAYBEDIFFERENTINDIFFERENTCOUNTRIES,BUTALLIMPLEMENTINGTHECONCEPTOFDECENTRALIZEDMANAGEMENT,MEETINGTHENEEDSOFEFFICIENCYANDFAIRNESSINTHECURRENT,CHINESEEXERTIONMODEOFTHEOPERATIONOWNERSHIPLACKOFASTRATEGICRESTRUCTURINGSYSTEMOFTHESTATEPROPERTYMANAGEMENTTHISIMPORTANTPOWERSHOULDBEGIVENTOTHEPEOPLESCONGRESSANDITSCOMMITTEESUNDERTHEPREMISETHATTHESTATEOWNEDENTERPRISESHAVETHERIGHTTOMAKETHEIROWNDECISIONS,THEGOVERNMENTANDITSSTATEOWNEDASSETMANAGEMENTCOMPANIESARERESPONSIBLEFORSPECIFICMANAGEMENT,THEPEOPLESCONGRESSISASUPERVISORSOWECANBUILDADUALEXERTIONMODELITMEETTHECURRENTSOCIAL

简介：华中科技大学硕士学位论文凝视的力量福柯法哲学思想研究姓名魏宇申请学位级别硕士专业法学理论指导教师齐海滨20090517华中科技大学硕士学位论文华中科技大学硕士学位论文IIABSTRACTFRENCHTHINKERMICHELFOUCAULTSTHEYCANBEDESCRIBEDASUNIQUEINTHETWENTIETHCENTURYHEHASINHERITEDTHENIETZSCHESGENEALOGYMETHODSUSEITSDISTINCTIVEPERSPECTIVEINPURPOSETOEXCAVATEOFWHICHWDSWEREBURIEDTOMAKEADECONSTRUCTIONONTHETWOSPECIALPLACESALUNATICASYLUMPRISONBASEDONTHISHEFMSHISOWNTHEYONTHEOPERATIONMODEOFSOCIETYWHICHDIFFERENTFROMTHOSEOFOTHERSTHENAPOWERSTRUCTUREWASESTABLISHEDBYTHE“GAZE”AUNIQUEAPPROACHSTEMFROMDEEPRESEARCHINGOFTHEMATERIALOFTWOSPECIALPLACESAFTERTHATFOUCAULTMAKEAHIGHLYABSTRACTOFTHESEMATERIALINTEGRATETHECOMMUNITYASAWHOLETHENCONSTITUTEHISPHILOSOPHYWHICHDIFFERENTFROMTHEMAINSTREAMTHEYTHEROLEOF“GAZE“ISTWOFOLDONTHEONEHISTHESTRUCTUREOFPOWERRELATIONSONTHEOTHERHITCANSEEMASACERTAINSOCIETYIMPETUSTHEREHASACERTAINRELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHEMAFTERTHEFMATIONOFTHEPOWERRELATIONSTHEWHOLECOMMUNITYHASBEENLINKEDMAKINGTHEDISTRIBUTIONOFPOWERLIKEMESHSTRUCTUREEACHPOINTOFTHECOMMUNITYINTERRELATEDWHILECONSTRAINTSWHICHCONSTITUTEANINDISPENSABLEPARTOFCOMMUNITYASARESULTOFTHISRELATIONSHIPBASEDONEACHPOINTOFSOCIETYSOWNNEEDSTHERULINGCLASSSCONTROLTHISBECOMESANIMPETUSTOSOCIALDEVELOPMENTOBVIOUSLYALTHOUGHTHEDEIONWASNOTEASYTOACCEPTFOUCAULTSALTERNATIVEDEIONPOINTOUTTHEPATHOFDEVELOPMENTTHISCANBESEENDIALECTICALLYAPPLIESTOTHESTUDYOFLAWFIRSTOFALLINTHISPAPERTHEIGINOFFOUCAULT’STHEYISANALYZEDTHENTHE“GAZE“ASTHEBREAKTHROUGHPOINTTOINTRODUCETHETWOASPECTSOFITSFUNCTIONFINALLYDISCUSSTHEPRACTICALSIGNIFICANCEONTHECONSTRUCTIONOFHARMONIOUSSOCIETYINCHINABYFOUCAULT’STHEYKEYWDSGAZEPOWERPOWERRELATIONSDRIVINGFCE

简介：行政听证是新世纪社会民主化的发展品，其在英国的奠基是自然公正原则，在美国的奠基是正当性原则和程序性原则，而我国则主要体现在依照法律管理行政原则。在行政听证制度蕴涵的所有价值中，人们往往只重视公民实质性权利，而忽视听证程序平衡公正，高效节约的价值。我国的行政处罚听证程序是行政听证制度的重要组成部分，对其进一步的探讨研究有利于行政听证制度的全面发展。行政处罚听证程序是指行政机关在对相对人作出重大惩罚前，赋予其说明申辩权，然后依核实确认的资料判定的一种程序。我国行政处罚法初次以法条明文确认了行政处罚听证程序，这是我国依照法定规制行政的一个方向标。多年实践已充分证明，听证可以增强当事人说明申辩权的发挥，协助行政机关降低错判度，有力体现出惩治教育结合。但我国听证程序不够细化，致使实践中产生许多条文理解上的争议，加之有的行政机关法律思维局限大或高专精人才断档，演变成听证形式主义，处罚产生信誉危机。为了使我国的行政处罚听证制度能够更好的适应社会主义市场经济运行的需求，必须要进一步完善其具体程序。本文将从行政处罚听证程序的必要性、中外行政处罚听证程序部分规定比较、我国行政处罚听证程序的缺陷及原因分析和我国行政处罚听证程序的完善四个方面进行论述。

简介：华中科技大学硕士学位论文司法能动与接近正义以纠纷解决、权利创设为视角姓名徐涛申请学位级别硕士专业经济法指导教师齐海滨20090501华中科技大学硕士学位论文华中科技大学硕士学位论文IIABSTRACTTHEREAREABOUT60000WDSINTHETEXTINADDITIONTOTHEINTRODUCTIONCONCLUSIONTHEPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOFOURCHAPTERSFROMTHELEVELCANBESEENASTWOLEVELSTHEFIRSTTIERJUDICIALACTIVISMINTHEJUDICIALREVIEWISTHETRADITIONALVISIONSOFJUDICIALACTIVISMTRADITIONALLYDEFINEDASAPHILOSOPHYWHICHMOTIVATESJUDGESTODEPARTFROMSTRICTADHERENCETOJUDICIALPRECEDENTINFAVOFPROGRESSIVENEWSOCIALPOLICIESTHECAUSESOFJUDICIALWAYWARDNESSDERIVEFROMHAVEPRODUCEDRELATEDPROBLEMSINTHEOTHERTWOBRANCHESINDEEDADISTTIONOFOURWHOLEFABRICOFCONSTITUTIONALGOVERNMENTINDERTORESTETRUECONSTITUTIONALGOVERNMENTWEMUSTLOOKNOTONLYTOJUDICIALACTIVISMBUTTOTHOSERELATEDPROBLEMSINTHEEXECUTIVELEGISLATURETHEIDEOLOGICALFLIPOFTHEJUDICIALACTIVISTHASREVEALEDTHEPOSSIBLEWEAKNESSOFRELIANCEONACTIVISMINTHECONTEXTOFAPOLITICOIDEOLOGICALARGUMENTANALYSISOFTHEJUDICIALEXERCISEITSROLECOULDONLYBENEFITFROMTHERECOGNITIONOFAVARIETYOFMEANINGSEXPRESSIONSOFACTIVISMEACHOFWHICHSHOULDBESEPARATELYASSESSEDWESHOULDBUILDAMULTILAYEREDMODELOFACTIVISMRECOGNIZETHEOTHERFACEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMTHESECONDLAYERJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSISTHEINNOVATIONOFTHISPAPERMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTSARETHEMOSTPROMINENTPERFMANCEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMJUDICIALACTIVISMISTHEACTUALNEEDOFJUSTICETHISPROCESSCOULDHOPEFULLYENDFURTHERRELIANCEONACTIVISMFPARTISANPURPOSESRESERVETHEFIELDFREASONEDANALYSESOFTHEROLEOFTHEJUDICIARYINTHISPAPERTHEREARETWOINNOVATIONSFIRSTTHEAUTHMAKESACOMPREHENSIVESYSTEMATICCOMPREHENSIVEACTIVISMFROMTHETWODIVERSIONSOFJUDICIALREVIEWLAWSUITSSUCHDIVERSIFICATIONPERSPECTIVEINTHEPREVIOUSSTUDIESISNOTOFTENTOSEESECONDTHEARTICLEREALIZESTHEINTEGRATIONOFJUDICIALACTIVISMCHINASJUDICIALREALITIESTHEFUTUREBASEDONCHINASPRACTICETHEAUTHADVOCATESTHEJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTSARETHEMOSTPROMINENTPERFMANCEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSINDERTOPROVIDENEWIDEASFCHINASJUDICIALREFMINTHEFUTUREKEYWDSJUDICIALACTIVISMMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTS

简介：华中科技大学硕士学位论文行政诉讼调解制度之探析姓名马凯申请学位级别硕士专业法学理论指导教师吴毅20090501华中科技大学硕士学位论文华中科技大学硕士学位论文IIABSTRACTADMINISTRATIVELAWWHICHHASGONETHROUGHMANYHUNDREDSOFYEARSWASBNINFRANCETHATCANNOTCOMPARETOCIVILLAWCRIMINALLAWWHICHHAVETHOUSSOFYEARSOFHISTYBUTWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFDEMOCRACYHUMANRIGHTSTHEADMINISTRATIVELAWBECOMESASIGNIFICANTLEARNINGISRELATEDTOOURLIVESDEMOCRACYTHERULEOFLAWHAVEBECAMETHEUNIVERSALVALUESATTHISBACKGROUNDTHEDEMOFMODERNADMINISTRATIVELAWFMTHECITIZENSISGROWINGADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINAPUBLICIN1989PROMOTEDTHEPROCESSOFDEMOCRACYHELPEDUSTOESTABLISHEDMARKETECONOMYSYSTEMINRECENTYEARSHOWEVERWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFJUDICIALPRACTICESOMELEGALPROVISIONSOFADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWSUCHASNO51OFCHINESEADMINISTRATIVELAWSAYSTHATMEDIATIONISNOTSUITABLEINADMINISTRATIVECASESACCDINGTOTHISITFBIDSMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONINOURCOUNTRYWHICHCOURSESMANYEXPERTSSCHOLARSQUESTIONTHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENTHEETICALPRACTICALMAKESTHEAPPLICATIONOFMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONBECOMINGAHOTTOPICFROMTHECONCEPTOFSTUDYABROADTAIWANASWELLASTHEDIFFICULTYOFOURREALITYIWANTTOSEEKABREAKTHROUGHWAYATTHEBASEOFTHEETICALINVESTIGATIONCOSTOFLITIGATIONWHENWEWANTTOMENDTHEADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINATHUSIWANTTOGIVESOMESUGGESTIONSTOHELPBUILDINGTHEMEDIATIONSYSTEMINTHEADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINATHISPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOFOURPARTSTODEMONSTRATEMEDIATIONTHEFIRSTPARTFROMTHE“MEDIATION“OFTHECONCEPTIWILLDEFINETHECONCEPTTHENATUREOFMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWASWELLASINTRODUCINGTHECONCEPTOFMEDIATIONTHERELEVANTCOMPARISONTHESECONDPARTFROMACOMPARATIVEPERSPECTIVE，IWANTTOPRESENTLEGISLATIVEEXPERIENCERELATEDTOTHESYSTEMPRACTICEEFFECTSOFUNITEDSTATESFRANCEGERMANYTAIWANITWILLPROVIDEAREFERENCEINDERTOHELPUSTOBUILDOURCOUNTRYSSYSTEMOFADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONMEDIATION

简介：烟台大学硕士学位论文空间碎片的法律规制问题研究姓名关燕申请学位级别硕士专业国际法学指导教师樊静20100312烟台大学硕士学位论文烟台大学硕士学位论文IIABSTRACTINRECENTYEARSASHUMANACTIVITIESINOUTERSPACEHAVEBECOMEINCREASINGLYFREQUENTTHENUMBERISPROLIFERATIONOFSPACEDEBRISSPACEDEBRISHASBECOMEAMAJSOURCEOFPOLLUTIONOFOUTERSPACESOTHEINTERNATIONALCOMMUNITYSATTENTIONATPRESENTTHEREGULATIONOFACTIVITIESINOUTERSPACEISTHEMAJLEGALDEVELOPMENTOFTHEFIVEUNITEDNATIONSOUTERSPACETREATYBUTITSAFEWOUTERSPACETREATIESREGULATINGTHEISSUEOFSPACEDEBRISREVEALSSERIOUSFLAWSSHTCOMINGSTHEREFEHOWTOBUILDEFFECTIVEEFFICIENTLEGALSYSTEMSPACEDEBRISTHENEEDFFURTHERSTUDYDISCUSSIONTHISPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOTHREECHAPTERSMETHAN30000WDSCHAPTERⅠOUTLINESTHEMAINPROBLEMSHAZARDSOFSPACEDEBRISTHROUGHANOVERVIEWOFSPACEDEBRISINTRODUCINGTHEINTERNATIONALCOMMUNITYTODEFINETHEMEANINGOFSPACEDEBRISSPACEDEBRISSOURCESTHEIRCLASSIFICATIONEXPLETHESPACEDEBRISCHAPTERIILOOKSATTHEEXISTINGLAWRELATINGTOSPACEDEBRISREGULATIONFIRSTOFALLINDEPTHANALYSISOFEXISTINGSPACEDEBRISWITHTHERELEVANTINTERNATIONALLEGALSYSTEMFOLLOWEDBYDETAILSONTHEMAJSPACEPOWERSTHEUNITEDSTATESRUSSIACHINASDOMESTICRELEVANTLEGISLATIONTHECONDUCTINDEPTHCHAPTERIIIPRESENTSTHEEXISTINGLAWRELATINGTOSPACEDEBRISREGULATYSHTCOMINGSIMPROVETHEPROPOSALFIRSTTHEINDUCTIONOFEXISTINGSPACEDEBRISTHESHTCOMINGSOFLEGALREGULATIONINTERNATIONALLAWLEVELINCLUDINGTHERELEVANTPROVISIONSOFTHEEXISTINGOUTERSPACETREATYLACKOFIDENTITYCANNOTBERECOGNIZEDBYSPACEDEBRISDAMAGELIABILITYCOMPENSATIONMECHANISMSFLOSSOFTHEMAINVACANCYLEVELOFDOMESTICLAWINCLUDINGINTERNATIONALTREATIESINTODOMESTICLAWTHEWKNEEDTOBESTRENGTHENEDONTHEPREVENTIONCONTROLOFSPACEDEBRISHASNOTYETFMEDANINDEPENDENTLEGALSPACEDEBRISSTILLNEEDTOCLEARLYDEFINEDACCOUNTABILITYTHENACOMPLETESETOFRECOMMENDATIONSINCLUDINGSETTINGSPECIALIZEDINTERNATIONALCONVENTIONSTHEESTABLISHMENTOFSPECIALIZEDINTERNATIONALGANIZATIONSASWELLASASOUNDCOMPLETELIABILITYMECHANISMSKEYWDSSPACEDEBRISSPACEENVIRONMENTDAMAGEOUTERSPACEINTERNATIONALLEGALREGULATION

简介：华中科技大学硕士学位论文专利产品的修理、再造与专利侵权法律问题研究姓名屈继伟申请学位级别硕士专业民商法学指导教师李扬20090517华华华华中中中中科科科科技技技技大大大大学学学学硕硕硕硕士士士士学学学学位位位位论论论论文文文文IIABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTTHISPAPERISSTARTEDFROMINTRODUCINGTHECONCEPTOF“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“OFPATENTEDPRODUCTSINPARTTWOITWILLBEANALYZEDSIXTYPICALCASESHAPPENEDINFEIGNCOUNTRIESTHENPROPOSEDTHREEQUESTIONSHOWTODETERMINETHEBOUNDARIESBETWEEN“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“ПWHETHER“RECONSTRUCTION“WILLCERTAINLYCAUSEADIRECTINFRINGEMENTШINWHICHSITUATIONTHEBEHAVIOFREPAIRINGREPLACINGPARTSFTHEOWNEROFPATENTWILLCAUSETHECONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTTHISPAPERTALKEDABOUTTHETHREEQUESTIONSWHICHAREABOVEMENTIONEDFINALLYITGAVETHEPRELIMINARYCONCLUSIONSFIRSTLYTHECLAIMSOFPATENTTHEPROPERTYOFPRODUCTSTHECONSUMER’SHABITSOFUSINGTHEEXTENTOF“REPAIR“THECONSUMPTIONCANBEUSEDTODISTINGUISH“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“ONLYINTHISCASEWHICHTHEPATENTPRODUCTSHAVEBEENREPAIREDREPLACEDARESTILLINTHEAREAOFPATENTCLAIMSTHATCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“WHENTHEPRODUCTISCONSIDEREDASSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOITSPROPERTIESREPAIRITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“WHILETHEPRODUCTLOSTITSFUNCTIONIFCONSUMERNOLONGERUSEITREPAIRITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“IFTHEEXTENTOFREPAIRTHECONSUMPTIONISABOUTEQUALTOMAKEANEWPRODUCTTHEACTIONCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“TOOOTHERWISEITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“REPAIR“SECONDLYITNEEDSTOSTRIKEABALANCEAMONGALLPARTIESTODETERMINETHE“RECONSTRUCTION“ACTIONWILLCAUSETHEDIRECTINFRINGEMENTNOTWHILEAPATENTISCONSIDEREDASSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOTHECONSUMER’SHABITSOFUSINGRECYCLINGSHOULDN’TBECONSIDEREDASINFRINGEMENTBUTITSHOULDBECONSIDEREDASDIRECTINFRINGEMENTWHENTHEPATENTISSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOTHEPROPERTYOFPRODUCTSTHEEXTENTOF“REPAIR“THECONSUMPTIONBECAUSETHERECYCLINGISNOTUSEFULFPROTECTINGTHEENVIRONMENTECONOMIZINGONRESOURCESTOPROTECTTHEINTERESTSOFPATENTEEITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“THIRDLYTOJUDGETHEMANUFACTURERSPROVIDINGREPLACEMENTPARTSSERVICEFCONSUMERWILLCAUSECONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTNOTWECANTHINKABOUT“WHETHERIT’SAGENERALMERCHISEHASSUBSTANTIALNONINFRINGINGUSES”“WHETHERIT’SASUBSTANTIALPARTOFTHEPATENT”KEYKEYKEYKEYWDSWDSWDSWDSREPAIRRECONSTRUCTIONCONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTCIRCULARECONOMY

简介：烟台大学硕士学位论文医疗费用保险理赔机制理论问题研究姓名张弛申请学位级别硕士专业民商法学指导教师史卫进20100312IIABSTRACTCHINASNEWLYREVISED“INSURANCELAW”STILLINSISTONTHEMARXISTLAWTHAT“ONEDIVIDESINTOTWO”REPRESENTEDBY“PROPERTYINSURANCE”“PERSONALINSURANCE”THISCLASSIFICATIONNEGLECTSTHESPECIFICITYOFHEALTHINSURANCEACCIDENTINSURANCE，WHICHISTHATTHEYHAVEBOTHTHENATUREOFFIXEDSUMINSURANCEINDEMNITYINSURANCETHEYCONSTITUTEASPECIALTYPEOFINSURANCEESPECIALLYFTHEMEDICALEXPENSEINSURANCEWHICHISBELONGSTOTHISTYPEOFINSURANCEALTHOUGHITISAKINDOFTHEPERSONALINSURANCEITHASTHENATUREOFPROPERTYINSURANCEJUSTBECAUSEITUNDERWRITETHESPECIFICMEDICALEXPENSECHINASINSURANCELAWDOESNOTSEETHESPECIALNATUREOFSUCHINSURANCEINTHEARTICLE2OF“INSURANCELAW”“PAYMENTOFINDEMNITIES”ISCRESPONDEDTO“PROPERTYLOSSES”“PAYMENTOFINSURANCEBENEFITS”ISCRESPONDEDTO“THEDEATHINJURYDISABILITYILLNESSOFTHEINSUREDCONDITIONSSUCHASAGETERMSPECIFIEDINTHECONTRACT”WHICHESSENTIALLYSETSUPTHECLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMOF“COMPENSATIONRULESAPPLICATEDTOPROPERTYINSURANCEPAYMENTRULESAPPLICATEDTOPERSONALINSURANCE”FTHEMEDICALEXPENSESINSURANCEONBEHALFOFSUCHHEALTHINSURANCEACCIDENTINSURANCEWHETHERTHEYARECOMPENSATYWHETHERWESHOULDUSESUBGATIONTHERULESOFDOUBLEINSURANCEWHATCLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMSHOULDWECHOOSEACADEMICSPRACTITIONERSONTHESEISSUESISQUITECONTROVERSIALINSURERSTHEINSUREDALSOHOLDDIFFERENTVIEWSONTHISPROBLEMWHICHHASCAUSEDMANYPROBLEMSINTHEJUDICIALPRACTICETHEINSURANCEPRACTICEIFWEDON’TMAKETHESEPROBLEMSCLEARITISHARMFULTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFCHINASINSURANCEINDUSTRYITISNOTCONDUCIVETOTHEINSUREDTHEBENEFICIARYOFTHEPROTECTIONOFLEGITIMATERIGHTSINTERESTSASWELLASTHEMAINTENANCEOFCHINASJUDICIALSERIOUSNESSBESIDESTHEPREFACECONCLUSIONTHEREAREFOURPARTSINTHISPAPERTHEFIRSTPARTTRIESTODEFINETHECONNOTATIONEXTENSIONOF“MEDICALEXPENSESINSURANCE”CLARIFIESTHESTATUSOFTHECLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMTHESIGNIFICANCEOFTHESTUDYOFTHISMECHANISMABOVETHESECONDPARTISABOUTTHESCOPEOFAPPLICATIONOFTHEINDEMNITY

简介：烟台大学硕士学位论文论我国刑法中的致人死亡姓名刘静申请学位级别硕士专业刑法学指导教师初炳东20080331IIABSTRACTABOUTTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“ALMOSTALLCOUNTRIESINTHECRIMINALLAWHAVETHERELATEDLEGISLATIONTOSTIPULATEBUTDUETOTHEDIFFERENCESINLEGALCULTURALTRADITIONSTHEETICALRESEARCHTHERESPECTIVESTIPULATIONALSOHASTHEVARIOUSDIFFERENCESLOOKINGFROMTHETHEETICALSTUDYOFTHEDEVELOPMENTTRENDTHECURRENTRESEARCHOFMYCOUNTRYON“CAUSINGDEATH“STILLHASTHEFAULTOFNOTENOUGHCOMPREHENSIVEONLYONSOMECRIMEINCIRMINALLAWMINUTERARESYSTEMDISCUSSEDFTHESAMEOFFENCE“CAUSINGDEATH“THEREARESTILLMANYDIFFERENTUNDERSTINGSVIEWSINTHEEDUCATIONALWLDRESULTINGINALOTOFDOCTRINALDISPUTESTHECONFUSIONSINJUDICIARYAPPLYINVIEWOFTHISTHEARTICLESENDSTODOASYSTEMELABATIONONTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“OFOURCRIMINALLAWINDERTOMAKETHEACADEMICCIRCLETHEPRACTICALSREALMTOTHISQUESTIONSATTENTIONTHEDISCUSSIONTHENENRICHOURCOUNTRYSCRIMINALLAWTHEYCONSUMMATEOURCOUNTRYSLEGISLATIONON“CAUSINGDEATH“EXCEPTTHEINTRODUCTIONCONCLUSIONTHEREARETHREEPARTSABOUT33000WDSTHEFIRSTPARTACADEMICALLYANALYZESALLTYPESOF“CAUSINGDEATH“INTHECRIMINALLAWOFCHINAFIRSTLYTHEAUTHSUMMARIZESALLKINDSOFLEGISLATIONPHENOMENONINCURRENTCRIMINALLAWOFCHINATRYINGTOREPLACETHOSEAMBIGOUSWDSINTHECRIMINALLAWOF1979THELEGISLATIVESTIPULATIONOFTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“INTHENEWCRIMINALLAWISOFCRIMINALJURISPRUDENCEVALUESECONDLYTHE

简介：博士学位论文美国美国法院附设仲裁研究法院附设仲裁研究ONAMERICANCOURTANNEXEDARBITRATION作者姓名王春丽1指导教师汪祖兴研究员1西南政法大学SOUTHWESTUNIVERSITYOFPOLITICALSCIENCELAW1内容摘要多元文化的融合与冲突既是美国的文化特征，亦是美国人接受多元解纷方式的社会条件。法院附设仲裁是美国在法院系统内创设的第一个ADR，并被誉为“司法ADR之父”。它是一种与传统仲裁迥然相异的纠纷解决机制，其发端于法院、运行于法院，且在诉讼的荫影下致力于纠纷的解决。法院附设仲裁的独特魅力在于其裁决不具约束力与终局性，却彰显了司法的公信力；其颠覆了人们对仲裁的传统认知却并非对传统仲裁之否定。法院附设仲裁不仅拓宽了仲裁的适用场域，还以其“庄严的非正式性”增加了“接近司法”的路径。本文除导论外，共分五个章节，主要内容为第一章是法院附设仲裁历史嬗变。诉讼与ADR的互动缔造了法院附设仲裁，庞德会议则为其提供了蓬勃发展的契机。在联邦立法方面，迄今为止最重要的建树为1998年替代性纠纷解决法；在实践方面，法院附设仲裁走过了三个发展阶段第一阶段是19701980年代，美国联邦法院首次试点附设仲裁；第二阶段是19902000年代，法院附设仲裁已发展成为法院案件管理实践的既定部分；第三阶段是2000年至今，附设仲裁成为广泛用于联邦和州级初审法院系统的替代性纠纷解决机制。第二章是美国法院附设仲裁学理分析。法院附设仲裁乃美国司法实用主义的智慧之作。实用主义司法乃法律实用主义的核心，其强调司法要关心后果，以及基于后果作出政策判断的倾向。实用主义法律进路对纠纷解决理论产生了深刻影响。将仲裁机制运用于法院管理中，既可节约法院资源，又能于法院语境下分流案件、消解纠纷，以上亦是仲裁附设于法院的因由。法院附设仲裁诞生后，诸多争议亦随之而起，诸如应否阻抑重新审判、应否舍弃仲裁之终局性内核、会否输出“次等正义”，批评者对其正当性提出质疑，却也间接推动了法院附设仲裁的发展。第三章是美国法院附设仲裁运作规程。联邦地区法院和州级初审法院之所以得以建立和实施法院附设仲裁，是源于ADR法所赋予的权力或固有授权。法院附设仲裁程序依开启、展开和结束三个阶段渐次铺开，这是仲裁运作的动态过程。自愿性与强制性仲裁是美国法院附设仲裁的两种模式，自愿性仲裁模式包括“选择进入”与“选择退出”型模式，强制性仲裁模式又分为“强制进入”与“法官下令进入”。通过本

简介：我国证券市场起步较晚几乎未经历证券非移动化的阶段直接在20世纪90年代初期沪深证券交易所基本实现证券的无纸化发行和流通。但因为转变过快大部分的市场参与主体如投资者、证券公司并不清楚无纸化证券与传统纸质证券有何区别。2005年新修订的中华人民共和国证券法中关于无纸化证券只有少数原则性规定2006年生效的证券登记结算管理办法中对证券账户、证券存管的规定是为了完善登记结算制度。但关于无纸化证券的基本问题如无纸化证券的权利属性、无纸化证券的交易生效要件、市场参与主体之间的法律关系、投资者保护等现有法律和部门规章对此并无明确规定。本文通过对德国、日本、美国的相关立法以及罗马统一私法协会制定的关于中介化证券的实体法公约的比较研究结合我国目前证券市场的透明持有结构构建以投资人证券账户为出发点的以权利本身股权、债权为客体的“准物权”权利体系用“准物权”理论解释证券无纸化后的权利归属问题并引入优先权、善意取得、损失分担等制度来保护投资者最后建议通过专门立法为无纸化证券交易流通提供确定性。

简介：R一、萋意，誊I羲毒_J≮萎一萎雾毒薯磊，雾豪’、毒。叠；美娄誊“I一三孑JO二毋IJ；亲’_主‘，T二IF’二；T≯≮_JO～，，爹L磐溅凳茹寡一，擎起搭Ⅳ≯～RURALELITEGOⅦRNANCERESEARCH_BASEDONⅥLLAGERS’SELFGOVERNANCEFORMPERSPECTIVEPRESENTEDBYHUANGBODISSERTATIONSUBMITTEDTONANJINGAGRICULTURALUNIVERSITYINPARTIALFULFILLMENTOFTHEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEDOCTORDEGREEOFPUBLICADMINISTRATIONSUPERVISEDBYPROFESSORLIUZUYUNCOLLEGEOFPUBLICADMINISTRATIONNANJINGAGRICULTURALUNIVERSITYNANJING，CHINAJUNE，2013

简介：分类号密级训Q≮单位代码10422学号删删川㈣㈣．ILLJ『JJJTLIL?RLLII|I『FIJJ11FY3408602”博士学位论文DISSERTATIONFORDOCTORALDEGREE论文题目年月日夕寻吖六娜篓眦／O蜘／∥吾|⑧名位称师师姓单名教导者养业导作作培专指合ORIGINALITYSTATEMENTIHEREBYSOLEMNLYDECLARETHATTHEDISSERTATIONSUBMITTEDBYMEISORIGINALANDISTHERESULTOFINDEPENDENTRESEARCHCONDUCTEDUNDERTHEGUIDANCEOFMYSUPERVISOR．THISDISSERTATIONDOESNOTCONTAINANYRESEARCHRESULTSORDISCUSSIONTHATHAVEBEENPUBLISHEDORWRITTENBYOTHERINDIVIDUALSORGROUPS．THELEGALLIABILITYOFTHISSTATEMENTSHALLBEBORNEBYME．AUTHOR’SSIGNATURE∽斛／枷LL／翰棚UEDA㈦Ⅻ』留，6、午ASTATEMENTABOUTTHEUSEAUTHORIZATIONOFDISSERTATIONSIAGREETHATTHEUNIVERSITYRETAINSORSENDSTHEPRINTEDVERSIONANDELECTRONICVERSIONOFTHEPAPERTOTHERELEVANTSTATEDEPARTMENTORAGENCY，ALLOWINGTHEDISSERTATIONTOBEVIEWEDANDBORROWED；IAUTHORIZESHANDONGUNIVERSITYTOCOMPILEALLORPARTOFTHEDISSERTATIONINTORELEVANTDATABASESFORRETRIEVALANDUSEPHOTOCOPYING，INDENTATION，OROTHERMEANSOFCOPYINGTOSAVETHEPAPERANDCOMPILETHEDISSERTATION．AFTERDECRYPTINGCONFIDENTIALPAPERSSHOULDCOMPLYWITHTHISREQUIREMENTAUTHOR’SSIGNIII。缒弘【苔，舌．／乒

简介：分类号D990密级公开||IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILJ0132539学校代码学号I争JC龙喜NORTHWESTUNIVERSITY学科名称国际法学作者袁瑞燕指导老师刘雁冰副教授西北大学学位评定委员会二。一七年六月西北大学学位论文知识产权声明书本人完全了解西北大学关于收集、保存、使用学位论文的规定。学校有权保留并向国家有关部门或机构送交论文的复印件和电子版。本人允许论文被查阅和借阅。本人授权西北大学可以将本学位论文的全部或部分内容编入有关数据库进行检索，可以采用影印、缩印或扫描等复制手段保存和汇编本学位论文。同时授权中国科学技术信息研究所等机构将本学位论文收录到中国学位论文全文数据库或其它相关数据库。保密论文待解密后适用本声明。学位论文作者签名意瑞葛指导教师签名＼衫L疥穆乃1年∥月孑日九门年∥月／日西北大学学位论文独创性声明本人声明所呈交的学位论文是本人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。据我所知，除了文中特别加以标注和致谢的地方外，本论文不包含其他人已经发表或撰写过的研究成果，也不包含为获得西北大学或其它教育机构的学位或证书而使用过的材料。与我一同工作的同志对本研究所做的任何贡献均已在论文中作了明确的说明并表示谢意。学位论文作者签名囊旃蓼为广7年乡月∥日

简介：上海交通大学博士学位论文宪法实施视点下海关缉私惩罚制度研究ASTUDYOFCUSTOMSANLLSMUGGLINGANDPENAITYFROMAPERSPECTTVEOFIⅧLEMENTATIONOFTHECONSTITUTL0N院系凯原法学院专业宪法学与行政法学姓名万曙春指导教师童之伟教授完成日期2014年6月3日